Sunday, February 21, 2010

Don't Disrupt Your Hormones

It was a proud moment for Endocrinologists when we were able to claim fat as the ultimate endocrine organ. Previously, adipose tissue (AKA Fat) was thought merely as an inactive tissue responsible for storing energy in the form of fat. Now it is known that our fat is much more active. Adipose tissue is a major player in the regulation of metabolism via the release of hormones such as leptin (we have discussed its role in satiety) and the cytokine TNF alpha (involved in systemic inflammation). Therefore it is not hard to fathom that any substance that interferes with our endocrine system will have potentially harmful effects on our metabolism. Well, recently it has become public knowledge that the majority of us encounter these types of substances on a minute by minute basis. The term endocrine disruptor chemical (EDC) is most likely something we will all be hearing a lot about now and in the future.

The basic definition of an endocrine disruptor is an exogenous (outside the body) substance that acts like a hormone in the endocrine system and disrupts the physiological function of endogenous (normally occurring) hormones. A few examples of EDCs include pesticides (DDT), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS,used as industrial lubricants and coolants), Bisphenol A (found in plastic bottles and baby bottles, dental materials, and food and infant formula cans), phthalates (soft toys, medical equipment, air fresheners) and phytoestrogens (soy). Initially the concern regarding EDC exposure was predominantly surrounding reproduction since hormones are the major contributing factor. EDCs have been identified as a likely culprit in the increased incidence of undescended testis in newborn boys, an overall decreasing sperm count, breast cancer and early puberty. These are no doubt very scary findings and now EDCs are being identified as one of the potential etiologies for the current obesity trend. The exponential increase in obesity correlates with the widespread use of industrial chemicals.

Studies in this area of research have demonstrated that the effect of EDCs occur at the fetal and neonatal stages of development which are obviously crucial stages. Increased exposure of these substances during these critical developmental stages in animal studies appeared to disrupt the normal process of fat regulation. Results demonstrated elevated levels of leptin and insulin at younger ages and prior to the development of obesity which indicates the presence of dysregulation. An alteration of genes governing metabolism during development may predispose people to a lifelong struggle with weight. The animal studies have shown that low birth weight animals exposed to EDCs develop weight rapidly, often doubling their weight in 7 days, and similar studies in low birth weight children are showing similar trends.

Given these implications it is reasonable to assume that people who eat "healthy" and exercise but continue to struggle with weight despite their greatest efforts may have been exposed to these EDCs at a young age or may have a high level of exposure currently. Unfortunately this seems to be yet another basis for confusion in this nutrition conundrum. I recently read an article in Men's Health Magazine called "The New American Diet" by Stephen Perrine and Heather Hurlock that provided some valuable insight into this new facet of nutrition.

Since pesticides and their metabolites can spur fat cell development at any age it is worth the extra price to go organic in certain areas. A study in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives showed that children who ate fruits and vegetables free of pesticides for just 5 days reduced their urinary levels of those pesticides to undetectable levels. According to the Environmental Working Group you can reduce pesticide exposure by 80% by knowing which fruits and vegetables to consume. Peaches, apples, celery, kale, strawberries, lettuce, cherries, carrots and pears are all high in pesticides so it may make sense to buy organic in these items.

We may not be tasting plastic but we are consuming it. 93% of Americans have detectable levels of BPA. Again, plastic mimics estrogen and can predispose to fat. A few points to consider, don't heat up plastic, try to avoid plastic wrapped meat and try to cut down on canned goods.

When it comes to meat, organic/grass fed is much better for a wide variety of reasons. In order to produce "fast" food conventionally grown beef is high in growth hormones that we are consuming. These hormones are obesogens that cause us to gain weight and experts have surmised this may be playing a role in the obesity epidemic.

In my opinion, I saved the best for last. Soy was the new health craze for the last decade. Thought to be good for the heart, specifically in women, many of us started drinking soy milk and eating more tofu and edamame. It turns out that soy is not all it was cracked up to be. Since we would have to eat about 2 pounds of soy per day to reap its heart benefit the American Heart Association withdrew its support of soy. Soy, specifically in men, causes the formation of more fat cells since it is estrogenic. Soy is present in french fries, salad dressing, baby formula and even chicken and fish since they now feed on soy to help them gain weight.

For me, this has been one of the most interesting entries to write since it is a relatively new body of information to consider and there is much more research to be done in this area. I also found in mind blowing!

Please continue to recommend this blog to your friends and family. Encourage them to sign up for email updates and as followers of the blog. I would love to hear your comments!

7 comments:

  1. Interesting read, as you know I changed to soy products a few years ago because I am sensitive to dairy, although I couldn't give up cheese :). I have now changed from soy to almond milk and have been looking into coconut milk to use in cereal. I have been hearing about the downside of ingesting too much soy and the hormone correlation, especially in young girls and boys who are hitting puberty at a much younger age. I didn't know about the plastic research and it is important to understand pesticides and where you purchase your fruit. Researches suggest buying Farmers market fruit because you can talk to the farmers and ask questions first hand, especially about pesticide spray. Thanks for the information Dr. Dodell :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. I am definitely a big advocate of almond milk. Not only does it have a low glycemic index but it tastes good too. I have been using it as the base for my protein shake in the morning. One of my goals is to try and get a farmers market to set up directly outside the hospital for an event to promote healthy eating to patients. Glad you enjoyed!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Doctor Dodell, I'm enjoying reading your entries and have been passing some of them on to friends and family. The green tea entry was a hit with my friend who imports high quality green tea from Japan. Admittedly, as a research scientist, I am skeptical of much of the pop culture food trends. However, you seem to have an informed opinion and do a good job of explaining yourself. Keep the articles coming. You are opening my mind a bit.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks Curt. Based on your scientific research background your informed opinion means a lot. Based on my reading over the years it appears that the research has yet to be conclusive in one way or another regarding the best nutrition approach, e.g. low carb vs. low fat, etc. However, I think it is beginning to be clear that eating processed foods high in chemicals and sugar is probably not the best approach. Your comment is much appreciated. Thank you for reading and passing along to your friends and family.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting entry! I'm always skeptical to go full force into any diet or nutritional fad for the very reasons you explained about soy. I've actually heard that many of the soy produced in this county isn’t organic but rather, comes from a genetically modified seed produced mainly by Monsanto. Do you think this has something to do with the increased weight gain resulting from soy?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Liz, I'm going to jump in and make a few comments about genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Genetically modified crops aren't inherently good or bad. I dont know what Monsanto has done with soy but, like with traditional breeding, GMOs, can be modified to adopt traits that may or may not be beneficial to the consumer. One thing is for sure, the large agribusinesses use them to enhance their profit (whether by increasing crop yield through resistance to pests or more robust growth characteristics or by making more attractive on the shelf). So far, it doesn't seem they are using them to improve your health. That doesn't mean they are inherently better or worse for you. If the marketplace demanded increase food value and health benefits, presumably they could be used to that end as well. That said, there is the fact that there is some uncertainty with GMOs with regard to both environmental and long term health impacts. One has to make a philosophical judgment on the relative risks associated with that. Those questions can only be resolved through experience and time. As Dr. Dodell says, it might be best to forgo that uncertainty and lean toward organic non-GMO foods for now.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Curt, thanking for jumping in and making such informative comments. You are certainly more knowledgeable in this aspect than me for sure. As far as weight gain, I agree that GMOs probably don't adversely effect the waist line more so than organic soy since it appears that it is the estrogenic properties that influence metabolism which is present in both forms. Soy has become a commodity, just like corn, because it is being used to fatten up animals for slaughter faster. I guess the fact that companies like Monsanto are involved in this process is evidence that this is about the bottom dollar.

    ReplyDelete